In defense of catalog correctness, as a collector it gives me a goal to work towards when restoring a vintage kit. I totally understand it was just a template, but without that template, what else do we have?
I appreciate that fact and you're right that the catalogs represent the best reference material available. What annoys me is the second class status that seems to attach itself to sets that don't match up with one of the few cataloged configurations. Ludwig (and the others) sold a lot of sets that were not exactly like those in the catalogs. More often than not these sets were ordered this way by drummers or store owners that, for whatever reason, wanted a set that reflected their personal needs or tastes. Whether that entailed a smaller or larger bass drum or floor tom or a metal snare in place of a wooden one (or vice-versa) or whatever, these outfits were just as valid combinations of instruments as the ones the sales department had put together as a "package deal".
But now, decades later, many seem to be overly concerned with pigeon holing any particular set of drums into one of these six or seven catalog outfits and often seem to end up quite disappointed to find out that their 12/16/20 or 12/14/22 or 13/18/24 (or whatever) set doesn't "fit" any of the approved templates.
It's cool if your set is just like the one pictured in the catalog...but it should be equally cool if that first owner managed to think outside the box and get the set he really wanted.
Not that this has anything to do with showing off downbeat snares.