What's the general consensus amongst the "experts" as to WHO made the best quality&thinnest shells&most innovative drum shells&hardware,&whose shells had the most minimal metal to shell contact out of ALL the vintage drum companies inc euro/***&uk makes i'm thinking Rogers myself.Also did Leedy make a free-floating drum design decades before Sleishman?.
Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
American vintage drums/free-floating drums. Last viewed: 1 day ago
Posted on 9 years ago
#1
Posts: 215
Threads: 11
Loading...
I'm NO expert but I love the 1980s Pearl free floaters.
Looking for a late 80's to early 90's, preferably Arctic White Pearl MLX 14x14 floor tom.
Posted on 9 years ago
#2
Posts: 525
Threads: 37
Loading...
What's the general consensus amongst the "experts" as to WHO made the best quality&thinnest shells&most innovative drum shells&hardware,&whose shells had the most minimal metal to shell contact out of ALL the vintage drum companies inc euro/***&uk makes i'm thinking Rogers myself.Also did Leedy make a free-floating drum design decades before Sleishman?.
Probably the Peavy Radial Pro
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Lgh_cdcCEw"]Steven Volpp aka Peavey Radial Pro 1000 RBS-1 *sound* Video #1 - YouTube[/ame]
Posted on 9 years ago
#3
Posts: 6524
Threads: 37
Loading...
What's the general consensus amongst the "experts" as to WHO made the best quality&thinnest shells&most innovative drum shells&hardware,&whose shells had the most minimal metal to shell contact out of ALL the vintage drum companies inc euro/***&uk makes i'm thinking Rogers myself.Also did Leedy make a free-floating drum design decades before Sleishman?.
SONOR.
and,.. SONOR.
Bout sums it up.
It`s a drum,.....Hit It !!
.....76/#XK9207 Phonic Sound Machine D454/D-505 snares !i
.....76/#XK9207 Phonic Sound Machine D454/D-505 snares !i
Posted on 9 years ago
#4
Posts: 563
Threads: 187
Loading...
What model/series/year Donors?.
Posted on 9 years ago
#5
Posts: 6524
Threads: 37
Loading...
The teardrop series had a very small footprint after striping off the trim. the lug is very small and the mounts were all small and the same as the BD. The older the better. Peoples complaints about drops is always that they are so thin and easy to warp. They had floating heads so there is no hoop or headring contact. You could find kits with knob/tube lugs but together that combination lug is heavier than a drop lug or even the small Ludwig lugs. But Ludwig had big mounts and tube lugs are heavy.
SONOR always went over the top with quality and engineering. It`s their trademark so to speak. The inside of a SONOR is always as presentable as the outside.
Just my opinion on the quality of the shell and trim. The larger, heavier stuff seems to solve a lot of shaking issues.
For freefloaters, you could go back to the teens and twenties and find SONOR free floating BD, snare trap combo`s. There rope drums from the 18`s could be considered free floaters too, but that`s a stretch.
It`s a drum,.....Hit It !!
.....76/#XK9207 Phonic Sound Machine D454/D-505 snares !i
.....76/#XK9207 Phonic Sound Machine D454/D-505 snares !i
Posted on 9 years ago
#6
- Share
- Report