Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 186.17954%

What brand is this double tom holder. MIJ?

Posts: 207 Threads: 72

Hi all!

Does someone know what this is? Driving me nuts.

Posted on 9 years ago
#1
Posts: 1651 Threads: 215

I have the same upper arms on my U.S.Mercury kit. I don't think you'll get it narrowed to a specific name as a few MIJ names used this tom mounting system.

18 Kits & 40+ snares..
Not a Guru, just addicted to drums

- Jay
Posted on 9 years ago
#2
Posts: 1725 Threads: 135

they are Pearl. late 60s - early 70s. Like Jay says, used on Pearl made stencil sets too. I had one on this kit that I used with just one tom. Quite handy that it could be used as a single or double set-up

2 attachments
01-SAM_0246.JPG
97.4 kB
1-SAM_0256-001.JPG
93.5 kB
Andrew

Golden Curtain
www.myspace.com/garagelandnz
Posted on 9 years ago
#3
Posts: 868 Threads: 134

+1 on Fayray

regards

Christian

Posted on 9 years ago
#4
Posts: 3467 Threads: 116

Yes as per Andrew... plus Maxwins used these also.. yours is set up wrongly... the shorter arm mounts on the post. Longer arm enters the tom.

Cheers

John

'77 Slingerland 51N,Super Rock 24,18,14,13.. COW 8,10 Concert toms
'69 Slingerland Hollywood Ace
'75 Rogers Dynasonic 6.5 x 14, 10 lug COB
'77-78 Slingerland 6.5 x 14, 10 lug COB
'78-79 Slingerland 5 1/4 x14 8 lug COB
'79 Biman 5 1/4, Acrolite
'82 Slingerland 5 1/4 x 14. Festival COS
'84 Tama MasterCraft Superstar 6.5 x 14, 10 lug Rosewood
'98 Slingerland (Music YO) 6" 10 Lug Maple.. NOS
Zildjian, Sabian , UFIP & Paiste mix.
Posted on 9 years ago
#5
Posts: 2413 Threads: 336

I would like to add - that this particular mount is not easy to find. The swivo type one that came after this one is regarded as a much better functioning, but these can work just fine. This one you have here appears to be in very good condition.

I had a great day! Instead of sleeping in and wasting the day, I got up at 8 and I had all my slacking done by noon!

2Timothy1:7
Posted on 9 years ago
#6
Posts: 6365 Threads: 223

From longjohn

Yes as per Andrew... plus Maxwins used these also.. yours is set up wrongly... the shorter arm mounts on the post. Longer arm enters the tom. CheersJohn

Hi John! (edit...I did make a mistake here, as I did not see the first picture. The proper way is when the key operated bolt faces up, regardless of post length. For the double-tom holder the short post does go into the double holder, like you said. Sorry about that!)

I see this quite a bit! Actually, it is set up correctly, with the SHORT arm going into the tom. The design of the mechanism is such that the key operated bolt faces UP, not AWAY. The arm is called the Free Adjustable and can be seen in the Pearl 1969 catalog here...[ame="http://pearldrum.com/support/product-catalogs/1969-general-catalog.pdf"]http://pearldrum.com/support/product-catalogs/1969-general-catalog.pdf[/ame]

Hope this helps!

-Mark

Posted on 9 years ago
#7
Posts: 1725 Threads: 135

I actually found it to be a really good design, especially when you think of the other tom holders out there at the time

Andrew

Golden Curtain
www.myspace.com/garagelandnz
Posted on 9 years ago
#8
Posts: 622 Threads: 24

Longjohn, you beat me to the post! Agree Pearl/Maxwin.

I had a Maxwin when I was a nipper, with exactly the same hex rod config you've got there, except the two tom arms went straight into a double tom mount on the bass. Same single bolt fasteners on top, which were, IMO, complete rubbish. A poor Rogers imitation produced a lot cheaper and probably quicker! Not at all sturdy enough to last a whole gig.

But on mine both arms were the same length. I might still have them somewhere, now I think of it...

Posted on 9 years ago
#9
Posts: 207 Threads: 72

Many thanks!

Posted on 9 years ago
#10
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action
Something else here