About two years ago, I received a nice 1960-’61 22” 3-ply Cleveland bass shell in a trade. It had already been drilled out for beavertails, so I just put a bunch of spare Fullerton hardware on it to make it playable. I posted a pic of it recently in another thread just to show the odd collect configuration. It has sat pretty much ignored in my cluttered basement until yesterday when I decided, just for fun, to pair it with my 4-piece Fullerton set and make a Louie Bellson-style, double bass setup…
[Attachment: 89947] [Attachment: 89948]
While dusting off my old double-bassing chops, I quickly noticed a pronounced difference in tonal quality between the two basses. Note that both basses have the exact same hardware (Fullerton), the same reso and batter heads, the same muffling (felt strip on the reso), and were tuned almost identically, so the only difference between the two is the shell. The 3-ply Cleveland was distinctively mellower, warmer in tone, while the Fullerton sounded a little sharper (like turning up the treble on an amp). I’m thinking that this audible difference was attributable to the significant differences in the bearing edges rather than the difference in plies (3 vs 5). I don’t know. I’m not saying one sound was superior over the other. Both sounded great and have their place, but this side-by-side comparison was enlightening. Just curious if anyone other Rogers owners have a preference between the 3-ply and 5-ply shells?
Mike