Only Admins can see this message.
Data Transition still in progress. Some functionality may be limited until the process is complete.
Processing Attachment, Gallery - 181.16910%

400 COB or not? Last viewed: 5 days ago

Loading...

So I've finally bought myself an old 60s superclassic in marine white and my attention is obviously now turning to snare drums.

It's only recently, through reading info on the web, that I've realised all my favourite 60s records were recorded using steel snares - and mostly played by Hal Blaine!!!. As such, my maple item is currently out of favour.

I've found a mid 60s 400 I'm thinking of buying, but I know the legendary COB is the one to get - at a price.

Can anyone tell me the difference in sound between the two please?

Does the COB sound considerably better? Is it worth the extra money??

Thanks,

Broadleaf.

Posted on 14 years ago
#1
Loading...

Hal Blaine used a supra 400 ludalloy not a steel shell. a brass shell compared to a ludalloy shell is warmer and a little darker sounding!

Your drummers not much good is he!? What you need is someone that's as good as me. ! John Henry Bonham !!
Posted on 14 years ago
#2
Loading...

In my opinion, the brass is the one. Many others on this forum would disagree. If possible, you should test drive both and see which is best for you. There is a significant price difference. I got my brass one for $10, but that was a ridiculous deal. Good luck.

Posted on 14 years ago
#3
Loading...

From atomicmorganic

In my opinion, the brass is the one. Many others on this forum would disagree. If possible, you should test drive both and see which is best for you. There is a significant price difference. I got my brass one for $10, but that was a ridiculous deal. Good luck.

Yeah, since I own both, it's a tough call depends on the gig and my mood,as to which one I'll use! broadleaf ,,but on a footnote the maple drum you are addressing is always a great tonal voice in your snare drum arsenal, you need a good wood and metal snare drum or several if possible!

Your drummers not much good is he!? What you need is someone that's as good as me. ! John Henry Bonham !!
Posted on 14 years ago
#4
Posts: 1071 Threads: 128
Loading...

BRASS all the way it's worth the money.

80's 13 pc sonor signature
1979 12 pc ludwig power factory
Posted on 14 years ago
#5
Loading...

I have the holy grail super Ludwig 1959 COB and to be honest i prefer the standard 400 its far more versatile you cant go wrong at the price

Posted on 14 years ago
#6
Loading...

If you do a search on this forum for "Alternatives to Supraphonics" you'll find a recent thread which had quite a lot of responses and contained a lot of useful info. I think that will answer some of your questions. I was wondering about the same sorts of things as you and on the recommendation of a few people, just picked up a 60's Slingerland Krupa Sound King, which is brass. Just waiting for it to arrive. I figured for the same price I could get a near mint Slingerland brass snare or a pitted non-brass Supra. And having played neither drum before, I had no real bias one way or the other. Yes, brass Supras are very desirable and that's definitely reflected in the prices. Not so cheap.

Though I've since played a Supra for the first time the other day (a mid 70's snare which I'm guessing would be a Ludalloy, non-brass shell) and was amazed at what a bright sounding drum it was. Probably the brightest snare I've ever heard. Maybe a bit too bright for my liking.

Oh yeah, I also love a lot of Hal Blaine's stuff.

Posted on 14 years ago
#7
Loading...

That's great, thanks everyone for your advice. I realised my 'steel' mistake as soon as i posted it...whoops.. I am relatively new to this vintage game.

It seems a real mixed bag, I guess owning both would be the perfect outcome!! Alas, one step at a time...

Thanks Drummy Drummerson, I'll check out the thread. I've seen a few soundking's for sale on the web, not too pricey either...

So Hal Blaine used a standard 400? That's food for thought...

I think I basically need to find a shop with both, and go try 'em.

Just out of interest, does anyone know the snare mitch mitchell used? I've seen photos of what looks like a 400. His snare sound on the first two hendrix albums is killer!!

Posted on 14 years ago
#8
Loading...

Mitch Mitchell used a ludwig 400 Ludalloy supraphonic,

Your drummers not much good is he!? What you need is someone that's as good as me. ! John Henry Bonham !!
Posted on 14 years ago
#9
  • Share
  • Report
Action Another action Something else here